This problem is addressed in PRISMA 2009, PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 1, AMSTAR 2, ROBIS and MECIR. Quality appraisal and risk of bias assessments from individual trials should be incorporated into the conclusions and interpretation of any treatment effect estimates from systematic reviews.
Articles that support this problem:
Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review
2017 : Nutrition research
Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency
2019 : Nutrients
The effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: a methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews
2020 : European journal of orthodontics
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature
2013 : Jbjs
Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review
2014 : Journal of clinical periodontology
Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement
2015 : Plos one
Lessons learnt on transparency, scientific process and publication ethics. The short story of a long journey to get into the public domain unpublished data, methodological flaws and bias of the Cochrane HPV vaccines review
2019 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Inadequate critical appraisal of studies in systematic reviews of time to diagnosis
2016 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study
2016 : Systematic reviews
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
2017 : Systematic reviews
Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review
2016 : Evidence based library and information practice
Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
2014 : Bmc medical research methodology
Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews
2020 : Bmc medical research methodology
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review
2017 : Cancer epidemiology
Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews
2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation
Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview
2017 : Journal of prosthetic dentistry
Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool
2020 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy
Quality of the Evidence Supporting the Role of Oral Nutritional Supplements in the Management of Malnutrition: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
2021 : Adv nutr
Common mistakes in reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
2020 : Health promotion perspectives
A critical evaluation of systematic reviews assessing the effect of chronic physical activity on academic achievement, cognition and the brain in children and adolescents: a systematic review
2020 : International journal of behavioral nutrition & physical activity
The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review
2014 : International journal of surgery
The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews in Japanese Physical Therapy Journals
2020 : Progress in rehabilitation medicine
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality
2013 : Journal of medical internet research
Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement
2016 : Jama facial plastic surgery
How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study
2016 : Acupuncture in medicine
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
2009 : Bmc pediatrics
Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews
2014 : Annals of internal medicine
The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments
2016 : Quality of life research
Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies
2012 : Human reproduction
How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study
2015 : J epidemiol community health
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
2013 : Bmj open
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
2018 : Bmc med res methodol
DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews
2019 : Acta diabetologica
Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics
2019 : Journal of dentistry
Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018)
2020 : Urology
Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008
2010 : The journal of urology
Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012
2015 : The journal of urology
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
2016 : Plos medicine
Methodological issues and recommendations for systematic reviews of prognostic studies: an example from cardiovascular disease
2014 : Systematic reviews
Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews
2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity
2017 : Clinical obesity
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study
2018 : Epidemiology & psychiatric science
The effectiveness of adjunctive measures in managing peri-implant mucositis: an umbrella review
2022 : International journal of implant dentistry
Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study
2022 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy
Harms reporting by systematic reviews for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a cross-sectional analysis
2023 : European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals
2023 : Epidemiology and health
Striving for Happily Ever After: Supportive Interventions for Youth Leaving Residential Placement. A Systematic Review of Reviews
2022 : Child & adolescent mental health
Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain
2023 : Neural plasticity
The Campbell Collaboration's systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards
2022 : Systematic reviews
Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
2022 : Journal of medical internet research
An umbrella review of systematic reviews on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer prevention and management, and patient needs
2023 : Elife
Examining the state, quality and strength of the evidence in the research on built environments and physical activity among adults: An overview of reviews from high income countries
2022 : Health & place
Chinese patent medicine Kanglaite injection for non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview of systematic reviews
2023 : Journal of ethnopharmacology
Quality of systematic reviews supporting the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension
2022 : Bmj evidence-based medicine