This problem is addressed in PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 1, AMSTAR 2 and MECIR. Potential conflicts of interest (including non-financial) should be disclosed. An absence of a conflict of interest statement for each author should not be interpreted as evidence that there were no conflicts of interest in the systematic review team.
Articles that support this problem:
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review
2017 : Cancer epidemiology
Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews on health policy and systems research: a cross sectional survey
2018 : International journal of health policy and management
Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool
2020 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy
Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012
2015 : The journal of urology
The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality
2017 : Bju international
Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines
2017 : The american journal of emergency medicine
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
2011 : Orthodontics & craniofacial research
Prostate Artery Embolisation: Poor Design and Reporting Impact the Value of Current Systematic Reviews
2018 : European urology
Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews
2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
Evaluating the quality of conduct of systematic reviews on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for aphasia rehabilitation post-stroke
2020 : Aphasiology
The effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: a methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews
2020 : European journal of orthodontics
Systematic Reviews in Craniofacial Trauma—Strengths and Weaknesses
2016 : Annals of plastic surgery
Synthesizing and Appraising the Quality of the Evidence on Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
2017 : Value in health regional issues
Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review
2009 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological cancer pain management
2015 : Pain management nursing
Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools
2018 : Journal of clinical periodontology
The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: a quality assessment of systematic reviews
2013 : Journal of the american dental association
Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation
2013 : Journal of the american dental association
Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews
2020 : Bmc medical research methodology
Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool
2015 : Npj primary care respiratory medicine
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals
2015 : Nursing outlook
Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review
2018 : Complementary therapies in clinical practice
Quality Assessment of Systematic Review of the Bariatric Surgery for Diabetes Mellitus
2019 : Journal of diabetes research
Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies
2012 : Human reproduction
The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map
2018 : Plos one [electronic resource]
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
2017 : Systematic reviews
Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals
2011 : Plos one
Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews
2016 : Systematic reviews
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
2018 : Systematic reviews
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2006 : Bmc medical research methodology
Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews
2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation
Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans
2013 : Journal of periodontology
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination
2014 : Vaccine
When trial authors write Cochrane Reviews: competing interests need to be better managed
2014 : Cochrane database of systematic reviews
Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018)
2020 : Urology
Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review
2018 : Jama ophthalmology
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study
2018 : Epidemiology & psychiatric science
Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of drug trials published in high-impact medical journals: comparison of results from 2017 to 2018 and 2009
2020 : Systematic reviews
The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
2020 : Bmc complementary medicine and therapies
Association between author conflicts of interest and industry-sponsorship with the favorability of outcomes of systematic reviews focusing on treatments of erectile dysfunction
2021 : Andrology
Do Author Conflicts of Interest and Industry Sponsorship Influence Outcomes of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Regarding Glaucoma Interventions? A Cross-sectional Analysis
2021 : Journal of glaucoma
Association between industry sponsorship and author conflicts of interest with outcomes of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions for opioid use disorder
2022 : Journal of substance abuse treatment
Adherence to conflicts of interest policy in Cochrane reviews where authors are also editorial board members: A cross-sectional analysis
2022 : Research synthesis methods
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. Preparations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam
Impact of industry sponsorship on the quality of systematic reviews of vaccines: a cross-sectional analysis of studies published from 2016 to 2019
2022 : Systematic reviews
Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of systematic reviews
2021 : Social science & medicine