Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided

This problem is addressed in PRISMA 2009, PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 1, AMSTAR 2, ROBIS and MECIR. Systematic reviews should tabulate the reason for excluding every study retrieved at full text stage.

Articles that support this problem:

Tai Chi and Parkinson's disease (PD): A systematic overview of the scientific quality of the past systematic reviews

2019 : Complementary therapies in medicine

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review

2017 : Cancer epidemiology

Methodologic quality of systematic reviews published in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a systematic review

2016 : Plastic and reconstructive surgery

The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: An analysis using AMSTAR

2014 : Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Journal impact factor is associated with PRISMA endorsement, but not with the methodological quality of low back pain systematic reviews: a methodological review

2020 : European spine journal

An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions

2012 : International journal of clinical pharmacy

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study

2020 : Heliyon

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008

2010 : The journal of urology

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)

2011 : Journal of applied oral science

Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality

2018 : Plos biology

Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018)

2020 : Urology

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics

2011 : Orthodontics & craniofacial research

A critical evaluation of systematic reviews assessing the effect of chronic physical activity on academic achievement, cognition and the brain in children and adolescents: a systematic review

2020 : International journal of behavioral nutrition & physical activity

Prostate Artery Embolisation: Poor Design and Reporting Impact the Value of Current Systematic Reviews

2018 : European urology

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews

2020 : Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews

2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy

Evaluating the quality of conduct of systematic reviews on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for aphasia rehabilitation post-stroke

2020 : Aphasiology

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans

2013 : Journal of periodontology

The effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: a methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews

2020 : European journal of orthodontics

Systematic Reviews in Craniofacial Traumaā€”Strengths and Weaknesses

2016 : Annals of plastic surgery

The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological cancer pain management

2015 : Pain management nursing

Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews

2020 : Bmc medical research methodology

The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: a quality assessment of systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of the american dental association

Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias

2013 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

2020 : Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals

2015 : Nursing outlook

Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review

2018 : Complementary therapies in clinical practice

DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

2019 : Acta diabetologica

Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals

2011 : Plos one

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 : Annals of the american thoracic society

A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us?

2015 : Annali dell'istituto superiore di sanita

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality

2017 : Systematic reviews

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on the Efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy for Adult and Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing

2016 : Journal of clinical sleep medicine

Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodonticā€related systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation

The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality

2017 : Bju international

The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible

2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview

2017 : Journal of prosthetic dentistry

Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review

2018 : Ophthalmic research

Methodological quality of systematic reviews and clinical trials on women's health published in a Brazilian evidence-based health journal

2013 : Clinics

Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group

2006 : The journal of rheumatology

The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library

2019 : Health & quality of life outcomes

Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics

2019 : Journal of dentistry

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 : Plos medicine

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study

2018 : Epidemiology & psychiatric science

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients-A methodological study

2021 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

The methodological quality and clinical applicability of meta-analyses on probiotics in 2020: A cross-sectional study

2021 : Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy

Clinical performance of and patient satisfaction with conventional complete dentures with different occlusal schemes: A systematic review of systematic reviews

2022 : Journal of prosthetic dentistry

Methodological appraisal of the evidence about efficacy of metabolic surgery in adults with non-morbid obesity and hypertension: An overview of systematic reviews

2022 : International journal of surgery

Mind-body practices for cancer-related symptoms management: an overview of systematic reviews including one hundred twenty-nine meta-analyses

2022 : Supportive care in cancer

The effectiveness of adjunctive measures in managing peri-implant mucositis: an umbrella review

2022 : International journal of implant dentistry

Exercise across the Lung Cancer Care Continuum: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

2023 : Journal of clinical medicine

How is the quality of the available evidence on molar-incisor hypomineralization treatment? An overview of systematic reviews

2022 : Clinical oral investigations

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Bodyweight Management Strategies for Children and Adolescents

2023 : Medicine & science in sports & exercise

Harms reporting by systematic reviews for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a cross-sectional analysis

2023 : European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology

Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals

2023 : Epidemiology and health

Striving for Happily Ever After: Supportive Interventions for Youth Leaving Residential Placement. A Systematic Review of Reviews

2022 : Child & adolescent mental health

Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain

2023 : Neural plasticity

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. Preparations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam

Chinese patent medicine Kanglaite injection for non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview of systematic reviews

2023 : Journal of ethnopharmacology

A Call for Improving Research on Pain Neuroscience Education and Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

2023 : Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy

Quality of systematic reviews on timing of complementary feeding for early childhood allergy prevention

2023 : Bmc medical research methodology

Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

2022 : Journal of medical internet research

An umbrella review of systematic reviews on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer prevention and management, and patient needs

2023 : Elife

An overview of the characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy/effectiveness of influenza antiviral drugs

2022 : Current medical research & opinion

Characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy and/or effectiveness of influenza vaccines: an overview of reviews

2022 : Infectious diseases

Trends in systematic reviews of kidney transplantation: A 10-year analysis of the evidence base

2023 : Transplantation reviews

Prescription drug monitoring programs evaluation: A systematic review of reviews

2023 : Drug & alcohol dependence

Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review

2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview of systematic reviews

2023 : The journal of integrative medicine

Identification of outcomes reported for hospital antimicrobial stewardship interventions using a systematic review of reviews

2023 : Jac-antimicrobial resistance

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study

2022 : Alzheimer's research & therapy

Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to prevent adverse events in the intensive care unit: A review of systematic reviews

2022 : Australian critical care

Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Chronic Urticaria: A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews

2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam

Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews

2022 : Journal of manual & manipulative therapy

A review found heterogeneous approaches and insufficient reporting in overviews on adverse events

2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

An Overview of Systematic Reviews: Acupuncture in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension

2022 : International journal of general medicine

Quality of systematic reviews supporting the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension

2022 : Bmj evidence-based medicine