This problem is addressed in PRISMA 2009, PRISMA 2020 and MECIR. The methods of a systematic review should be reported in enough detail to allow someone else to replicate the entire review.
Articles that support this problem:
Tai Chi and Parkinson's disease (PD): A systematic overview of the scientific quality of the past systematic reviews
2019 : Complementary therapies in medicine
Systematic reviews of surgical procedures in children: quantity, coverage and quality
2013 : Journal of paediatrics and child health
An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions
2012 : International journal of clinical pharmacy
Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency
2019 : Nutrients
Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy based on the PRISMA-DTA reporting guideline
2019 : Clinical chemistry
Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000–2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?
2014 : Research synthesis methods
Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high-impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross-sectional study
2016 : Plos one
Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry
2013 : Journal of clinical periodontology
The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible
2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines
2017 : Journal of the medical library association: jmla
Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports
2004 : Journal of the medical library association
Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011
2013 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2008 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?
2020 : Bulletin of emergency & trauma
The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review
2014 : International journal of surgery
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
2003 : Journal of the royal society of medicine
Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews
2014 : Health information & libraries journal
The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
2019 : Health & quality of life outcomes
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
2016 : Plos medicine
Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity
2017 : Clinical obesity
Systematic review literature searches must be comprehensive and reproducible if their conclusions are to drive the research agenda and clinical practice changes
2022 : Acta paediatrica, international journal of paediatrics
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
2021 : Bmc medical research methodology
Methodological issues in designing and reporting of systematic reviews in assessing association between vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 severity
2023 : Qjm
Synthesis methods other than meta-analysis were commonly used but seldom specified: survey of systematic reviews
2023 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
If exercise is medicine, why don't we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease
2022 : British journal of sports medicine
Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
2022 : Bmc medical research methodology
Comment on "A systematic review of trials investigating the efficacy of exercise training for functional capacity and quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients"
2022 : International urology and nephrology
The Campbell Collaboration's systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards
2022 : Systematic reviews
Comment on "Ticks infected with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV): A decision approach systematic review and meta-analysis regarding their role as vectors"
2023 : Travel medicine and infectious disease
A review found heterogeneous approaches and insufficient reporting in overviews on adverse events
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264]
2022 : International journal of surgery
Letter to the Editor concerning "the influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on lumbar spine surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Parish JM, et al. (Eur Spine J [2021]; 30(5):1365-1379)
2022 : European spine journal
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
2022 : Bmj
Saturated fat, the estimated absolute risk and certainty of risk for mortality and major cancer and cardiometabolic outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
2023 : Systematic reviews
A study of search strategy availability statements and sharing practices for systematic reviews: Ask and you might receive
2023 : Research synthesis methods
Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study
2023 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology