Failure to consider equity, different socioeconomic groups or disadvantaged populations

Articles that support this problem:

Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review

2010 : Trials [electronic resource]

How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions

2010 : Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Is health equity considered in systematic reviews of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group?

2008 : Arthritis care & research

Consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing healthcare-associated infections: a methodology study

2019 : Bmc health services research

Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals

2020 : Journal of rehabilitation medicine

Equity issues were not fully addressed in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews

2017 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Systematic reviews reveal unrepresentative evidence for the development of drug formularies for poor and nonwhite populations

2009 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm

2012 : Bmc medical research methodology

Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study

2018 : Systematic reviews

Equity was rarely considered in Cochrane Eyes and Vision systematic reviews and primary studies on cataract

2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Prevalence and significance of race and ethnicity subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews

2020 : Clinical trials

The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study

2018 : Systematic reviews

Research on subgroups is not research on equity attributes: Evidence from an overview of systematic reviews on vaccination

2017 : International journal for equity in health

Authorship diversity among systematic reviews in eyes and vision

2020 : Systematic reviews

Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study

2022 : Systematic reviews

Assessment of health equity consideration in Cochrane systematic reviews and primary studies on urolithiasis

2023 : Health science reports

Authorship diversity in Gastroenterology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation

2022 : Frontiers in medicine