- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- Individual study characteristics not reported sufficiently
Articles that support this problem:
Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
2010 : Trials [electronic resource]
Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018)
2020 : Urology
The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study
2020 : Heliyon
Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
2014 : Bmj open
Systematic reviews of surgical procedures in children: quantity, coverage and quality
2013 : Journal of paediatrics and child health
Generalizability of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the Leading General Medical Journals
2020 : Journal of rehabilitation medicine
Methodologically weak systematic review of Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy calls for more rigorous trials
2013 : Focus on alternative and complementary therapies
Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews
2020 : Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal
Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews
2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions
2012 : International journal of clinical pharmacy
Journal impact factor is associated with PRISMA endorsement, but not with the methodological quality of low back pain systematic reviews: a methodological review
2020 : European spine journal
Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans
2013 : Journal of periodontology
Evaluating the quality of conduct of systematic reviews on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for aphasia rehabilitation post-stroke
2020 : Aphasiology
Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
2017 : Systematic reviews
The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias
2018 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy based on the PRISMA-DTA reporting guideline
2019 : Clinical chemistry
Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review
2014 : Plos one
Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews
2016 : Systematic reviews
Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Quality Assessment Errors and Study Misclassification Threaten Systematic Review Validity: Community Opioid Overdose Prevention and Naloxone Distribution Programs Review
2015 : Journal of addiction medicine
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of non-Cochrane updates of systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study
2020 : Research synthesis methods
Lack of sex-related analysis and reporting in Cochrane Reviews: a cross-sectional study
2022 : Systematic reviews
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. Preparations for Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam
A review found heterogeneous approaches and insufficient reporting in overviews on adverse events
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Trends in systematic reviews of kidney transplantation: A 10-year analysis of the evidence base
2023 : Transplantation reviews
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview of systematic reviews
2023 : The journal of integrative medicine