This problem is addressed by PRISMA 2009, PRISMA 2020. Whether or not journals require a PRISMA checklist to be attached, adherence to this guideline will improve the reporting of any systematic review.
Articles that support this problem:
Tai Chi and Parkinson's disease (PD): A systematic overview of the scientific quality of the past systematic reviews
2019 : Complementary therapies in medicine
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials
2020 : Bjs open
Analysis of reporting of systematic reviews in physical therapy published in Portuguese
2012 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy
Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines
2017 : The american journal of emergency medicine
Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity
2017 : Clinical obesity
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
2016 : Plos medicine
Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement
2016 : Jama facial plastic surgery
The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review
2014 : International journal of surgery
Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines
2019 : Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature
2013 : Jbjs
Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review
2018 : Complementary therapies in clinical practice
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews
2017 : Bmc ophthalmology
Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation
2013 : Physical therapy
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
2017 : Systematic reviews
Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy based on the PRISMA-DTA reporting guideline
2019 : Clinical chemistry
Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals
2011 : Plos one
Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement
2015 : Plos one
Methodological Assessment in a Systematic Review for Anal Human Papillomavirus among Men
2019 : Journal of infectious diseases
Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview
2016 : The spine journal
Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review
2018 : Jama ophthalmology
Issues in reporting of systematic review methods in health app-focused reviews: A scoping review
2020 : Health informatics journal
Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study
2021 : Frontiers in medicine
An Analysis of the Evidence Underpinning the American Urologic Association Clinical Practice Guidelines
2022 : Urology
Assessing the Reporting and Frequency of Harms in Systematic Reviews Focused on Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies: A Cross-sectional Analysis
2023 : Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Methodological issues in designing and reporting of systematic reviews in assessing association between vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 severity
2023 : Qjm
Quality analysis of prior systematic reviews of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of the literature
2022 : Sao paulo medical journal
Systematic reviews on the success of dental implants present low spin of information but may be better reported and interpreted: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis
2022 : Clinical implant dentistry & related research
Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer
2022 : Laryngoscope
Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
2022 : Bmc medical research methodology
The Quality of Literature Search Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (1998-2021)
2023 : Journal of urology
Characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy and/or effectiveness of influenza vaccines: an overview of reviews
2022 : Infectious diseases
Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Systematic review reporting quality within dermatology: Bibliometric trends compared with general medicine and general surgery from 2008 to 2017
2022 : Journal of the american academy of dermatology
Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Chronic Urticaria: A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews
2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam
Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool
2020 : International journal of technology assessment in health care
Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study
2022 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy
Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study
2023 : Bmc medical research methodology
Quality of reporting among systematic reviews underpinning the ESC/ACC guidelines on ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death
2022 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Quality of systematic reviews supporting the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension
2022 : Bmj evidence-based medicine