Low reporting (PRISMA) quality

This problem is addressed by PRISMA 2009, PRISMA 2020. Whether or not journals require a PRISMA checklist to be attached, adherence to this guideline will improve the reporting of any systematic review.

Articles that support this problem:

Tai Chi and Parkinson's disease (PD): A systematic overview of the scientific quality of the past systematic reviews

2019 : Complementary therapies in medicine

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials

2020 : Bjs open

Analysis of reporting of systematic reviews in physical therapy published in Portuguese

2012 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy

Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines

2017 : The american journal of emergency medicine

Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity

2017 : Clinical obesity

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 : Plos medicine

Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement

2016 : Jama facial plastic surgery

The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review

2014 : International journal of surgery

Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines

2019 : Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature

2013 : Jbjs

Methodological and reporting quality evaluation of systematic reviews on acupuncture in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review

2018 : Complementary therapies in clinical practice

The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews

2017 : Bmc ophthalmology

Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation

2013 : Physical therapy

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality

2017 : Systematic reviews

Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy based on the PRISMA-DTA reporting guideline

2019 : Clinical chemistry

Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals

2011 : Plos one

Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement

2015 : Plos one

Methodological Assessment in a Systematic Review for Anal Human Papillomavirus among Men

2019 : Journal of infectious diseases

Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey

2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist

2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study

2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview

2016 : The spine journal

Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review

2018 : Jama ophthalmology

Issues in reporting of systematic review methods in health app-focused reviews: A scoping review

2020 : Health informatics journal

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study

2021 : Frontiers in medicine

An Analysis of the Evidence Underpinning the American Urologic Association Clinical Practice Guidelines

2022 : Urology

Assessing the Reporting and Frequency of Harms in Systematic Reviews Focused on Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies: A Cross-sectional Analysis

2023 : Journal of minimally invasive gynecology

Methodological issues in designing and reporting of systematic reviews in assessing association between vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 severity

2023 : Qjm

Quality analysis of prior systematic reviews of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of the literature

2022 : Sao paulo medical journal

Systematic reviews on the success of dental implants present low spin of information but may be better reported and interpreted: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis

2022 : Clinical implant dentistry & related research

Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer

2022 : Laryngoscope

Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study

2022 : Bmc medical research methodology

The Quality of Literature Search Reporting in Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (1998-2021)

2023 : Journal of urology

Characteristics and methodological standards across systematic reviews with Meta-analysis of efficacy and/or effectiveness of influenza vaccines: an overview of reviews

2022 : Infectious diseases

Systematic reviews of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 continue to be poorly conducted and reported: a systematic review

2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Systematic review reporting quality within dermatology: Bibliometric trends compared with general medicine and general surgery from 2008 to 2017

2022 : Journal of the american academy of dermatology

Acupuncture and Related Therapies for Chronic Urticaria: A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews

2022 : Evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine: ecam

Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool

2020 : International journal of technology assessment in health care

Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study

2022 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy