- Framework of problems / Transparent
- No registered or published protocol
- Skin assessments and interventions for maintaining skin integrity in nursing practice: An umbrella review
| Ref ID | 1010 |
| First Author | A. Fastner |
| Journal | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES |
| Year Of Publishing | 2023 |
| URL | https://www-sciencedirect-com.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0020748923000603?via%3Dihub |
| Keywords |
Risk of bias Nursing Dermatology Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
No registered or published protocol High risk of bias (ROBIS) Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided Undocumented or unjustified deviations to the review protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 12 |
| Summary of Findings | Of the 26 systematic reviews assessed with AMSTAR 2, nine reviews were rated with a critically low overall confidence due to having at least two critical weaknesses. In total, 19 systematic reviews did not have an explicit statement protocol availability or deviation. Further, 16 reviews did not provide a list of excluded studies with their reasons. Three of the five systematic reviews assessed with ROBIS were excluded due to ‘high’ or ‘unclear’ risk of bias in all domains and thus, high overall risk of bias. Of the reviews assessed with AMSTAR 2 seven had low overall confidence. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |