Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews

Ref ID	1019
First Author	L. He
Journal	FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Year Of Publishing	2023
URL	https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094360/full
Keywords	• Risk of bias • Low methodological quality • Mental health
Problem(s)	• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided • Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed • Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality • No registered or published protocol • Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
Number of systematic reviews included	8
Summary of Findings	From eight systematic reviews identified through 9 databases from inception to December 2022. AMSTAR 2 rated five SRs as extremely low quality and three SRs as low quality. The items with the lowest compliance rates in AMSTAR 2 included an explanation of selection included study designs (12.5%), a prior protocol provided (50%), report on the sources of funding for included studies (0%), and provision of a list of excluded studies with justifications (25%). ROBIS graded three out of eight SRs as “high risk.” The PRISMA checklist showed that three of the eight SRs scored less than 20 (out of a maximum of 27).
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results?	N/A
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?