Efficacy of Physical Activity Promoting Interventions in Physical Therapy and Exercise Therapy for Persons With Noncommunicable Diseases: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Ref ID 1024
First Author A. Jung
Journal PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION JOURNAL
Year Of Publishing 2024
URL https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/104/7/pzae053/7639162?login=true
Keywords Physiotherapy
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Meta-analyses and forest plots presented without considering risk of bias / quality
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 14
Summary of Findings The overall methodological quality of the included systematic reviews according to AMSTAR 2 was critically low in 5 reviews (36%). Most reviews did not provide a list of excluded studies (86%; 12/14) or did not assess the potential impact of Risk of Bias in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis (if meta-analysis was performed) (79%; 11/14); only 1 review reported on the sources of funding for the incuded studies.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?