An Overview of Reviews to Inform Organization-Level Interventions to Address Burnout in Rheumatologists

Ref ID 1031
First Author H. Kheirkhah
Journal JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2023
URL https://www.jrheum.org/content/50/11/1488.long
Keywords Rheumatology
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Funding or sponsor of systematic review not reported
Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias
Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
No registered or published protocol
Number of systematic reviews included 15
Summary of Findings Out of the 15 included systematic reviews, 9 (60%) were rated critically low using AMSTAR 2. Only 2 (13.3%) reviews explicitly noted registration of a protocol prior to conducting the review or provided a list of excluded studies with justification. Fourteen reviews (93.3%) did not report sources of funding for the included studies. Five (33.3%) reviews did not conduct a risk of bias assessments for the primary studies, and of those that did only 7 (46.6%) accounted for risk of bias in the interpretation of results.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?