- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias
- An Overview of Reviews to Inform Organization-Level Interventions to Address Burnout in Rheumatologists
| Ref ID | 1031 |
| First Author | H. Kheirkhah |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.jrheum.org/content/50/11/1488.long |
| Keywords |
• Rheumatology • Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided • Funding or sponsor of systematic review not reported • Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias • Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review • Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality • No registered or published protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 15 |
| Summary of Findings | Out of the 15 included systematic reviews on strategies that could be implemented to prevent burnout among rheumatologists, indexed in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo between 2011 and 2022, 9 (60%) were rated critically low using AMSTAR 2. Only 2 (13.3%) reviews explicitly noted registration of a protocol prior to conducting the review or provided a list of excluded studies with justification. Fourteen reviews (93.3%) did not report sources of funding for the included studies. Five (33.3%) reviews did not conduct a risk of bias assessments for the primary studies, and of those that did only 7 (46.6%) accounted for risk of bias in the interpretation of results. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |