Reporting of adverse events of treatment interventions in multiple myeloma: an overview of systematic reviews

Ref ID 1038
First Author M. Mainou
Journal ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2024
URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-023-05517-7
Keywords • Harms
• Oncology
• Low methodological quality
• Disclosure
• Protocols
• Haematology
Problem(s) • No registered or published protocol
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
• Meta-analyses and forest plots presented without considering risk of bias / quality
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Greece
Checklists • AMSTAR 2
Aim To present all systematic reviews (SRs) indexed on Medline, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos.org up to September 2023, focusing on adverse events due to antimyeloma treatments, the methods of identifying and presenting adverse events, and the use of appropriate methods to synthesize the results, as well as reproducibility of results.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings From 23 included 7 SRs indexed on Medline, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos.org up to September 2023, focusing on adverse events due to antimyeloma treatments. The quality of included studies as judged by AMSTAR 2 was mostly critically low. None of the reviews provided a list of excluded studies, or reported on the sources of funding of studies, only 1 review assessed the potential impact of risk of bias in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis, and 9 reviews (39.1%) did not have an a priori registered protocol.
Number of systematic reviews included 23
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 1966
Treatment impacted Not Applicable
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description