An overview of systematic reviews examining the quantitative sensory testing-derived hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy for musculoskeletal pain

Ref ID 1051
First Author L.J. Rodgers
Journal JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY
Year Of Publishing 2024
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37908101/
Keywords • Pain
• Low methodological quality
• Musculoskeletal
• Orthopaedic
Problem(s) • Single reviewer / lack of double checking
• Insufficient literature searches
• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
• Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• Redundant / overlapping / duplicated review question; leads to research waste
Number of systematic reviews included 29
Summary of Findings Of the 29 [note discrepancy: abstract reports 30] included systematic reviews, only 1 (3%) was judged to be high quality using AMSTAR 2 assessments with 17 (57%) deemed critically low quality. Only 3 reviews (10.3%) reported a comprehensive literature search; 14 (48.2%) did not perform data extraction in duplicate; 22 (75.8%) did not provide a list of excluded studies; 28 (96.5%) reviews reported on the sources of funding for the included studies.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? N/A
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?