Current state of systematic reviews for platelet-rich plasma use in knee osteoarthritis

Ref ID 1054
First Author G. Sahi
Journal ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMATOLOGY SURGERY RESEARCH
Year Of Publishing 2024
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877056823002712?via%3Dihub
Keywords Musculoskeletal
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Lack of prespecification in eligibility criteria
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 41
Summary of Findings Of the 41 SRs included in the analysis none were deemed high quality. Seven SRs (17%) were of “low” quality, while the remainder (34 SRs, 83%) were rated as “critically low”. The least reported items were: 1) 27/41 (65.8%) did not explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review; 2) 37/41 (90.2%) did not provide a list of excluded studies with justifications; 3) 34/41 (82.9%) did not report on the sources of funding for the included studies; 4) 32/41 (78.0%) did not account for risk of bias in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?