Consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing healthcare-associated infections: a methodology study

Ref ID 170
First Author J. Lopez-Alcalde
Journal BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Year Of Publishing 2019
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419810/pdf/12913_2019_Article_4001.pdf
Keywords • General medical
• Equity
• Cochrane
Problem(s) • Failure to consider equity, different socioeconomic groups or disadvantaged populations
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Spain
Aim To assess the extent to which Cochrane reviews of interventions published between 1995 to 2016 for preventing healthcare-associated infections consider sex and gender using the Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews (SGAT-SR).
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Consideration of sex and gender was practically absent in the included reviews. No review met all the applicable items of the Sex and Gender Appraisal Tool for Systematic Reviews, and 50% fulfilled no item of this checklist. No review provided a complete description of the sex and the gender of the samples of the included studies. Only 10% of reviews planned to perform sex- and gender-based analysis and only 3% could complete the analysis. 3% of reviews considered sex or gender-related findings in the conclusions.
Number of systematic reviews included 113
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 7156
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description