- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- No registered or published protocol
- Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO?
| Ref ID | 232 |
| First Author | S. Sideri |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2017 |
| URL | https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/149418/1/OA14_Papageorgiou.pdf |
| Keywords |
• Dentistry • Pre-specification • Protocols |
| Problem(s) |
• No registered or published protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 182 |
| Summary of Findings | From the 182 orthodontic published systematic reviews included, 20.3% were registered in PROSPERO, with registration rates ranging from 4.3% in 2012 to 37.0% in 2016. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |