- Framework of problems / Objective
- Failure to define clinically meaningful outcomes
- Trust, but verify. The errors and misinterpretations in the Cochrane analysis by O. J. Storebo and colleagues on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate for the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD
Ref ID | 267 |
First Author | T. Banaschewski |
Journal | ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE |
Year Of Publishing | 2016 |
URL | https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/pdf/10.1024/1422-4917/a000433 |
Keywords |
Cochrane Pharmacological Error Paediatrics Heterogeneity Risk of bias |
Problem(s) |
Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews Flawed risk of bias undertaken Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity Errors in effect estimate calculations or data synthesis Failure to define clinically meaningful outcomes |
Number of systematic reviews included | 1 |
Summary of Findings | The authors highlight that within a Cochrane systematic review on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate for the treatment of children and adolescents with ADHD, the study selection was flawed and undertaken without sufficient scientific justification. It is concluded that due to flaw in meta-analysis and the heterogenous trial designs, the effect sizes were calculated as too small and, moreover, were inadmissibly clinically interpreted. The methodology of the assessment of bias and quality is not objective and cannot be substantiated by the data. The conclusion of the authors is stated to be grossly misleading. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Yes |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |