The effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults: a methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews

Ref ID 299
First Author S. Incerti Parenti
Journal EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
Year Of Publishing 2020
URL https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-abstract/42/5/483/5554856?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Keywords • Dentistry
• Risk of bias
• Disclosure
• Low methodological quality
• Low reporting quality
• Protocols
• Single reviewer
Problem(s) • No registered or published protocol
• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
• Single reviewer / lack of double checking
• Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• Funding or sponsor of systematic review not reported
• Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Italy
Checklists • AMSTAR 2
Aim To assess the methodological quality (AMSTAR 2) of systematic reviews of the use of mandibular advancement devices for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea published up to 3rd June 2019.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings All included systematic reviews had more than one critical flaw in AMSTAR2, so their methodological quality was rated as critically low. The most common issues included non-registration of study protocol, absence of list of excluded studies, no acknowledgment of funding of included studies, no impact of risk of bias on systematic reviews results or interpretation and discussion of results, and data extraction not in duplicate.
Number of systematic reviews included 10
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 149
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description