Assessment of methodological quality for included studies is necessary in a systematic review

Ref ID 315
First Author J. G. Zhao
Journal CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Year Of Publishing 2015
URL http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/pages/default.aspx
Keywords • Risk of bias
• Surgery
Problem(s) • No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Article Type Editorial
Article Subtype Comment/letter
First Author Country China
Aim A letter highlighting the conduct of one systematic review of the prevalence of bloodstream infection associated with arterial catheters.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The letter highlighting the conduct of one systematic review of the prevalence of bloodstream infection associated with arterial catheters states that no quality assessment was undertaken in this systematic review.
Number of systematic reviews included 1
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 1
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description