An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence

Ref ID 341
First Author F. Hoffmann
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2020
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31809847/
Keywords • General medical
• Language
• Risk of bias
• Protocols
Problem(s) • No registered or published protocol
• No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Germany
Aim To assess reporting and methodological aspects of systematic reviews on prevalence and cumulative incidence data from a random sample of systematic reviews indexed in PubMed up to 18 April, 2018.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Few included reviews were registered with PROSPERO (5.6%). One-quarter considered articles without languages restrictions (25.1%). Regional restrictions of included studies were applied in 22.8%. 49.3% of reviews assessed risk of bias or study quality.
Number of systematic reviews included 215
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 22035
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description