Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study

Ref ID 453
First Author W. W. S. Tam
Journal BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5702238/pdf/12874_2017_Article_432.pdf
Keywords • Nursing
• Low methodological quality
• Currency
Problem(s) • Outdated searches
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Singapore
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
Aim To assess the time taken between the last search, submission, acceptance and publication dates of systematic reviews published in nursing journals. Methodological quality of the systematic reviews were also evaluated (AMSTAR).
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The median time from the last search to acceptance for systematic reviews published in nursing journals was 393 days. The quality of these reviews was low with the median score of 3 out of 11.
Number of systematic reviews included 202
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 949
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description