Reporting of the role of the expert searcher in Cochrane Reviews

Ref ID 477
First Author L. Zhang
Journal EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE
Year Of Publishing 2006
URL https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/57
Keywords • General medical
• Cochrane
Problem(s) • Literature searches not validated by information specialist
Number of systematic reviews included 105
Summary of Findings The role of an information specialist in conducting the literature searches was not reported in 35.2% of included reviews. There was insufficient data to analyse whether the quality of the searches carried out by librarians was better than the quality of those performed by non‐librarians
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? No
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No