Reporting of the role of the expert searcher in Cochrane Reviews

Ref ID 477
First Author L. Zhang
Journal EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY & INFORMATION PRACTICE
Year Of Publishing 2006
URL https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/57
Keywords • General medical
• Cochrane
Problem(s) • Literature searches not validated by information specialist
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Canada
Aim To assess the role of information specialists and librarians in the preparation of Cochrane systematic reviews published between 1997-2002. Additionally to determine whether information specialists impact the quality of searching in Cochrane systematic reviews.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The role of an information specialist in conducting the literature searches was not reported in 35.2% of included reviews. There was insufficient data to analyse whether the quality of the searches carried out by librarians was better than the quality of those performed by non‐librarians
Number of systematic reviews included 105
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 169
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted No
Interpretation impacted description