Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation

Ref ID 487
First Author J. G. De Buitrago
Journal JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
Year Of Publishing 2013
URL https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(14)60634-6/fulltext
Keywords • Dentistry
• Low methodological quality
• Searching
• Publication bias
• Grey literature
• Single reviewer
• Disclosure
• Risk of bias
Problem(s) • Lack of supplementary searches beyond databases
• Language restriction
• Grey literature excluded
• Poor consideration of publication bias
• Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing
• Single reviewer / lack of double checking
• No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country United States
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
Aim To assess the methodological quality (AMSTAR) of systematic reviews published in 3 databases between 1999 and 2013 on the topic of alveolar ridge preservation.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Several areas of deficit were frequent in the included reviews including: Quality assessment or risk of bias not reported Single reviewer / lack of double checking Lack of supplementary searches beyond databases; Language restriction; Grey literature excluded; Poor consideration of publication bias; Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed; Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality; Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing
Number of systematic reviews included 8
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 150
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description