- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- Flawed risk of bias undertaken
- Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials
| Ref ID | 561 |
| First Author | F. Wuytack |
| Journal | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
| URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323681/pdf/13643_2018_Article_924.pdf |
| Keywords |
• General medical • Risk of bias • Inference • Cochrane |
| Problem(s) |
• Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias • Flawed risk of bias undertaken |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 100 |
| Summary of Findings | Just under half of non-Cochrane reviews did not conduct a risk of bias assessment. Only one in ten non-Cochrane reviews reported the reasons for ascribing trials with high risk of bias for sequence generation |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |