- Framework of problems / Transparent
- No registered or published protocol
- Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study
| Ref ID | 580 |
| First Author | Y. Tsujimoto |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2017 |
| URL | https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)30181-6/fulltext |
| Keywords |
Protocols General medical |
| Problem(s) |
No registered or published protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 284 |
| Summary of Findings | 21% of the 284 included systematic review registered or published their protocol. The association between PRISMA adherence and protocol registration was not statistically significant. The association between outcome reporting bias and protocol registration was not statistically significant. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | No |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |