Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools

Ref ID 581
First Author K. Bouchard
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2011
URL https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(11)00026-6/pdf
Keywords • General medical
Problem(s) • Inflexible methods to complex questions
• Following guidelines is no guarantee of a rigorous systematic review
Article Type Editorial
Article Subtype Comment/letter
First Author Country Canada
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
• OQAQ
Aim Research letter highlighting 12 intervention systematic reviews and 10 mixed methods systematic reviews which were assessed using AMSTAR and OQAQ.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The average AMSTAR score of the 22 included systematic quantitative reviews was significantly higher than that of mixed-methods reviews. As such tools are designed for typical intervention reviews, they may not be valid and appropriate for mixed methods systematic reviews.
Number of systematic reviews included 22
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 22
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description