Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences

Ref ID 603
First Author S. Hopewell
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2015
URL https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(15)00151-1/fulltext
Keywords • Abstract / summary
• General medical
• Currency
• Error
Problem(s) • Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
• Unpublished or "zombie" reviews (the file-drawer effect)
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country United Kingdom
Checklists • PRISMA-A
Aim To assess the publication and quality of reporting of abstracts of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Only around half were published in full within 3 years of presentation at the conference. There were many deficiencies in reporting according to PRISMA for abstracts which limits the reliability of the assessed conference abstracts to accurately represent the corresponding systematic reviews.
Number of systematic reviews included 103
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 26840
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description