- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias
- Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review
| Ref ID | 629 |
| First Author | C. M. Faggion Jr |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2014 |
| URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24666018/ |
| Keywords |
• Dentistry |
| Problem(s) |
• No quality assessment undertaken or reported • Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias • Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review • Interpreted without considering certainty or overall quality of the evidence base • Single reviewer / lack of double checking • Inclusion of observational / non-randomised studies |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 159 |
| Summary of Findings | Only 15 (9%) of the 159 included systematic reviews incorporated the quality of evidence of primary studies into the report. Only 50% of systematic reviews reported independent and duplicate assessment of methodological quality; 69% of systematic reviews reported methodological approaches in the Materials/Methods section. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |