| Ref ID | 630 |
| First Author | C. M. Faggion |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2018 |
| URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpe.12893 |
| Keywords |
• Spin • Disclosure • Single reviewer • Low reporting quality • Dentistry • Risk of bias |
| Problem(s) |
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality • High risk of bias (ROBIS) • Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing • Flawed risk of bias undertaken • Single reviewer / lack of double checking • Spin or subjective interpretation of findings |
| Article Type | Empirical |
| Article Subtype | Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review |
| First Author Country | Germany |
| Checklists |
• AMSTAR 1 • ROBIS |
| Aim | To appraise systematic reviews and to identify potential disagreements of systematic review authors regarding risk of bias evaluations of RCTs included in systematic reviews on peri-implant diseases using ROBIS and AMSTAR |
| Level of Investigation | Descriptive |
| Summary of Findings | High risk of bias was detected for most systematic reviews (n=25) using ROBIS, whilst five systematic reviews displayed low methodological quality by AMSTAR. Almost 30% of the RoB comparisons (for the same RCTs) had different RoB ratings across systematic reviews |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 23 |
| Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed | 32 |
| Treatment impacted | No |
| Treatment impacted description | |
| Interpretation impacted | Not Applicable |
| Interpretation impacted description |