- Framework of problems / Rigorous
- Flawed risk of bias undertaken
- Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools
| Ref ID | 630 |
| First Author | C. M. Faggion |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2018 |
| URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpe.12893 |
| Keywords |
• Spin • Disclosure • Single reviewer • Low reporting quality • Dentistry • Risk of bias |
| Problem(s) |
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality • High risk of bias (ROBIS) • Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing • Flawed risk of bias undertaken • Single reviewer / lack of double checking • Spin or subjective interpretation of findings |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 23 |
| Summary of Findings | High risk of bias was detected for most systematic reviews (n=25) using ROBIS, whilst five systematic reviews displayed low methodological quality by AMSTAR. Almost 30% of the RoB comparisons (for the same RCTs) had different RoB ratings across systematic reviews |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |