Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study

Ref ID 632
First Author Z. Wang
Journal CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2015
URL https://www.dovepress.com/front_end/cr_data/cache/pdf/download_1618846282_607da24ae60b2/CLEP-78879-systematic-reviews-with-language-restrictions-and-no-author-_033115.pdf
Keywords • Language
• Missing data
• Author
• Endocrinology
Problem(s) • Language restriction
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country United States
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
Aim Endocrine-related systematic reviews were assessed to examine the association between language restriction, author contact for missing data, and the overall AMSTAR score.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Fewer than half of 69 included systematic reviews reported contacting study authors or searched non–English literature. Systematic reviews that did not conduct these two steps had lower AMSTAR quality scores
Number of systematic reviews included 69
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 69