Is quality control of Cochrane reviews in controversial areas sufficient?

Ref ID 670
First Author J.M. Bjordal
Journal JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Year Of Publishing 2006
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16566678/
Keywords • Rheumatology
• Influence
• Subgroup
• Reproducibility
• Cochrane
• Error
• Searching
Problem(s) • Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews
• Errors in study inclusion or omission of relevant studies
• Unplanned or unjustified subgroup or sensitivity analyses
• Errors or omissions in search strategy
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Case study
First Author Country United Kingdom
Aim To assess the reliability and sensitivity of conclusions from a Cochrane systematic review published in 2004 with negative conclusions of low-level laser therapy for osteoarthritis. The review was checked against a 9-item checklist for discrepancies between included studies and the results were replicated to detect if review conclusions were robust.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The Cochrane review's conclusions was found to neither robust nor valid. Eighteen questionable selections were identified including omissions of trials and data and unperformed subgroup analysis which favoured negative review conclusions.
Number of systematic reviews included 1
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 1
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description