Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship

Ref ID 705
First Author D. Pieper
Journal SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Year Of Publishing 2018
URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0722-9
Keywords • Cochrane
• Author
• General medical
• Allegiance
• Disclosure
Problem(s) • Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing
• Non-financial conflicts of interest of review authors
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Germany
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
Aim To assess the frequency of reviewers who authored included studies (dual co-authorship) of overview systematic reviews with the included systematic reviews and the impact on quality rating, if any. Both Cochrane and non Cochrane systematic reviews were included.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings From the included sample of 98 systematic reviews, 51% of non-Cochrane reviews and 90% of Cochrane overviews had included at least one systematic review with dual co-authorship (reviewers who authored included studies). Higher quality scores were given to reviews in systematic overviews where dual co-authorship was present for both Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
Number of systematic reviews included 98
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 98
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description