• Interpreted without considering certainty or overall quality of the evidence base
Article Type
Editorial
Article Subtype
Comment/letter
First Author Country
United States
Aim
A letter highlighting the conduct of one systematic review in emergency medicine which concluded that clinical decision making is not impacted by implicit bias.
Level of Investigation
Descriptive
Summary of Findings
The authors highlight that without high quality evidence and on the basis of clinical vignettes, the authors were not able to draw meaningful conclusions.
Number of systematic reviews included
1
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed
1
Treatment impacted
No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted
No
Interpretation impacted description
Does the article have a publicly available protocol?
Not Applicable
Did the review team include both methodological and clinical experts?
Not Applicable
Sampling strategy for obtaining the systematic reviews under assessment
Pre Selected
Was the sample size of systematic reviews subject to any formal sample size or power calculation?
Not Applicable
Were any or all of the study selection and data extraction performed in duplicate?
Not Applicable
Were any statistical adjustments made to correct for confounding?
Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?
