Perils of systematic reviews

Ref ID 768
First Author A. Lang
Journal CMAJ
Year Of Publishing 2005
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15795389
Keywords • Spin
• Cochrane
• Gynaecology
Problem(s) • Spin or subjective interpretation of findings
Article Type Editorial
Article Subtype Comment/letter
First Author Country Ottawa
Aim A letter highlighting a reported unwarranted conclusion from a Cochrane systematic review of support for women and families after a perinatal death published in 2004 with no included studies
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The letter highlights a reportedly unwarranted conclusion from a Cochrane systematic review published in 2004 which included no studies of support for women and families after a perinatal death. The authors caution that conclusions from reviews that include no high-quality studies must be considered carefully and should be well substantiated by other evidence.
Number of systematic reviews included 1
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 1
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description