| Ref ID | 823 |
| First Author | J. Roberge-Dao |
| Journal | JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2022 |
| URL | https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Abstract/2022/04000/Quality,_methods,_and_recommendations_of.6.aspx?context=FeaturedArticles&collectionId=2 |
| Keywords |
• Low reporting quality • General medical • Low methodological quality • Non-Cochrane reviews • Protocols |
| Problem(s) |
• No quality assessment undertaken or reported • Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE) • No registered or published protocol |
| Article Type | Empirical |
| Article Subtype | Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review |
| First Author Country | Canada |
| Checklists |
• JBI |
| Aim | To assess the reporting and methodological quality (JBI) of systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures across health care professions indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC up to January 18, 2021. |
| Level of Investigation | Descriptive |
| Summary of Findings | From 10 included systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures across health care professions indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC up to January 18, 2021, the overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. None of the reviews assessed the quality of primary studies or adhered to methodological guidelines, and only one registered a protocol. |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 10 |
| Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed | 10 |
| Treatment impacted | No |
| Treatment impacted description | |
| Interpretation impacted | Not Applicable |
| Interpretation impacted description |