| Ref ID | 824 |
| First Author | Z. Munn |
| Journal | JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2021 |
| URL | https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Abstract/2021/05000/The__quality__of_JBI_qualitative_research.6.aspx?context=FeaturedArticles&collectionId=2 |
| Keywords |
• Transparency • Qualitative • JBI |
| Problem(s) |
• Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE) |
| Article Type | Empirical |
| Article Subtype | Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review |
| First Author Country | Australia |
| Checklists |
• JBI |
| Aim | To assess the reporting and methodological conduct (JBI and ENTREQ) of qualitative systematic reviews in the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (JBISRIR) between 2015 to 2017. |
| Level of Investigation | Descriptive |
| Summary of Findings | Of the 33 qualitative systematic reviews in the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (JBISRIR) between 2015 to 2017, several areas were identified where reviewers consistently made errors or did not clearly report their findings, including study screening and selection issues (particularly how this was done and by whom), transparent rationale for study exclusion, who performed data extraction and how, processes for developing synthesized findings, and the development and presentation of recommendations. |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 33 |
| Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed | 33 |
| Treatment impacted | No |
| Treatment impacted description | |
| Interpretation impacted | Not Applicable |
| Interpretation impacted description |