Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews

Ref ID 903
First Author S.P. Riley
Journal JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10669817.2022.2110419
Keywords • Low methodological quality
• Protocols
• Non-Cochrane reviews
• Musculoskeletal
• Pre-specification
• Transparency
Problem(s) • Lack of prespecification in eligibility criteria
• Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
• Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• No registered or published protocol
• Undocumented or unjustified deviations to the review protocol
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country United States
Checklists • AMSTAR 2
Aim To establish if verified prospective registration of systematic reviews (SRs) and the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that they use affect an SR’s methodological quality on AMSTAR 2.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings From twenty included musculoskeletal systematic reviews indexed in MEDLINE, between 1 January 2018 and 18 August 2021. One (5.0%) of the 20 included reviews were prospectively registered and published. Of these, 13 (65.0%) were registered through PROSPERO, 2 (15.4%) prospectively, and 11 retrospectively. Nineteen (95.0%) of the 20 identified systematic reviews was categorized as ‘critically low’ methodological quality (AMSTAR 2). The AMSTAR-2 items that were least reported were: availability or deviation from a protocol; authors explaining their selection of the study designs for inclusion; authors providing a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions; authors reporting on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review.
Number of systematic reviews included 20
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 703
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description