Articles that support this problem:
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions
2016 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools
2011 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice
2016 : Plos one
Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making
2013 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review
2008 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Validity of a Cochrane Systematic Review and meta-analysis for determining the safety of vitamin E
2017 : Bmc complementary & alternative medicine
Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision-making?
2010 : Digestive and liver disease
Contradictory Findings of Two Recent Meta-Analyses: What Are We Supposed to Believe About Anesthetic Technique in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery?
2021 : Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia