- Framework of problems /
- Overly stringent inclusion criteria affecting external validity
Articles that support this problem:
External Validity The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?
2017 : Evaluation review
The challenge of external validity in policy‐relevant systematic reviews: a case study from the field of substance misuse
2010 : Addiction
Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm
2012 : Bmc medical research methodology
The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence
2010 : Bmj
Limitations of Conclusions of Systematic Review and MetA-Analysis Because of Exclusion of Groups Most at Risk
2017 : Journal of the american geriatrics society
The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias
2018 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Validity of a Cochrane Systematic Review and meta-analysis for determining the safety of vitamin E
2017 : Bmc complementary & alternative medicine
Why are Cochrane hepato-biliary reviews undervalued by physicians as an aid for clinical decision-making?
2010 : Digestive and liver disease
Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
2010 : Acupuncture in medicine
Striking Errors in the Methodology, Execution, and Conclusions of the Cochrane Library Review of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Low Back Pain by Traeger et al
2023 : Pain medicine
Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational study
2022 : Bmc medical research methodology