Articles that support this problem:
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review
2017 : Cancer epidemiology
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Relating to Performance of All-Ceramic Implant Abutments, Frameworks, and Restorations
2021 : Journal of prosthodontics
An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions
2012 : International journal of clinical pharmacy
Quality assessment of systematic reviews of vitamin D, cognition and dementia
2018 : Bjpsych open
Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012
2015 : The journal of urology
Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics
2019 : Journal of dentistry
Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008
2010 : The journal of urology
Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics
2011 : Orthodontics & craniofacial research
Methodological quality of systematic reviews and clinical trials on women's health published in a Brazilian evidence-based health journal
2013 : Clinics
Prostate Artery Embolisation: Poor Design and Reporting Impact the Value of Current Systematic Reviews
2018 : European urology
Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review
2018 : Ophthalmic research
Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews
2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy
Assessment of methodological quality for included studies is necessary in a systematic review
2015 : Critical care medicine
Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview
2017 : Journal of prosthetic dentistry
Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review
2017 : Nutrition research
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality
2013 : Journal of medical internet research
Synthesizing and Appraising the Quality of the Evidence on Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
2017 : Value in health regional issues
The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map
2018 : Plos one [electronic resource]
An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence
2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools
2005 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review
2014 : Journal of clinical periodontology
The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological cancer pain management
2015 : Pain management nursing
Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal
2009 : American journal of clinical nutrition
Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases
2012 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review
2016 : Evidence based library and information practice
The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: a quality assessment of systematic reviews
2013 : Journal of the american dental association
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2006 : Bmc medical research methodology
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals
2015 : Nursing outlook
The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments
2016 : Quality of life research
Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies
2012 : Human reproduction
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews
2017 : Bmc ophthalmology
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
2017 : Systematic reviews
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
2017 : Systematic reviews
The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry
2012 : The veterinary journal
Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks
2020 : Journal of medical virology
Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals
2011 : Plos one
Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality
2009 : Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review
2012 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews
2006 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs)
2013 : Plos one
Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review
2014 : Plos one
Methodological Assessment in a Systematic Review for Anal Human Papillomavirus among Men
2019 : Journal of infectious diseases
Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study
2005 : Bmj
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
2020 : Bmc medical research methodology
Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews
2020 : Bmc medical research methodology
Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews
2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation
Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?
2020 : Bulletin of emergency & trauma
Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans
2013 : Journal of periodontology
Systematic reviews in burns care: poor quality and getting worse
2017 : Journal of burn care & research
Peer Reviewed: Quality of Systematic Reviews of Observational Nontherapeutic Studies
2010 : Preventing chronic disease
Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews
2008 : Clinical journal of the american society of nephrology
Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments
2009 : Quality of life research
DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews
2019 : Acta diabetologica
Methodologic quality of systematic reviews published in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a systematic review
2016 : Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology
2017 : Journal of hand surgery (european volume)
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
2016 : Plos medicine
Methodological issues and recommendations for systematic reviews of prognostic studies: an example from cardiovascular disease
2014 : Systematic reviews
Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: guidance for future prognosis reviews
2009 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality
2017 : Bju international
Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement
2016 : Jama facial plastic surgery
Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines
2019 : Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics
Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation
2013 : Journal of the american dental association
Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta‐epidemiology study
2020 : Journal of evidence‐based medicine
Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review
2022 : Jbi evidence synthesis
Quality assessment practice in systematic reviews of mediation studies: results from an overview of systematic reviews
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
The Campbell Collaboration's systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards
2022 : Systematic reviews