- Framework of problems /
- Spin or subjective interpretation of findings
Articles that support this problem:
How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine
2003 : Journal of the royal society of medicine
Multiple overlapping systematic reviews facilitate the origin of disputes: the case of thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism
2018 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Several reasons explained the variation in the results of 22 meta-analyses addressing the same question
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different?
2007 : Jbjs
The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews
2016 : Bmc medical research methodology
Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: a case study
2012 : Bmc medical research methodology
Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High-Impact Factor Journals
2020 : Clinical chemistry
Overinterpretation of research findings: evidence of “spin” in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
2017 : Clinical chemistry
Eight Out of Every Ten Abstracts of Low Back Pain Systematic Reviews Presented Spin and Inconsistencies With the Full Text: An Analysis of 66 Systematic Reviews
2020 : Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy
A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
2016 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools
2018 : Journal of clinical periodontology
No evidence-based practice by biased information from systematic reviews: the case of etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis
2008 : Clinical & experimental rheumatology
Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998
2001 : Bmj
Some problems with Cochrane reviews of diet and chronic disease
2005 : European journal of clinical nutrition
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews
2017 : Bmc ophthalmology
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Reporting Bias Regarding the Association between Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
2014 : Plos medicine
Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study
2016 : Research synthesis methods
Perils of systematic reviews
2005 : Cmaj
Spin the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Regarding the Treatment of Meniere's Disease
2021 : Annals of otology, rhinology and laryngology
Over 30% of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Focused on Rotator Cuff Tear Treatments Contained Spin in the Abstract
2021 : Arthroscopy
Letter to the Editor - Not even the top general medical journals are free of spin: A wake-up call based on an overview of reviews
2021 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Assessment of spin in abstracts of Endodontic Systematic Reviews with meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2022. Are we in need of more transparent interpretation of findings?
2022 : International endodontic journal