Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)

Articles that support this problem:

Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews

2008 : Clinical journal of the american society of nephrology

Methodological quality of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser therapy in restorative dentistry

2010 : Lasers in medical science

The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high‐impact nursing journals: a review of the literature

2014 : Journal of clinical nursing

Peer Reviewed: Quality of Systematic Reviews of Observational Nontherapeutic Studies

2010 : Preventing chronic disease

A review of methodological quality of systematic reviews on multiple pregnancies

2006 : Journal of obstetrics & gynaecology

Methods and reporting of systematic reviews of comparative accuracy were deficient: a methodological survey and proposed guidance

2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments

2009 : Quality of life research

The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library

2019 : Health & quality of life outcomes

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry

2014 : Journal of periodontal research

Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review

2014 : Plos one

An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs)

2013 : Plos one

Cochrane systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines: an overview

2011 : Plos one

Blinded by PRISMA: are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines?

2014 : Plos one

The "quality" of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance

2021 : Jbi evidence synthesis

Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review

2022 : Jbi evidence synthesis

Synthesis methods other than meta-analysis were commonly used but seldom specified: survey of systematic reviews

2023 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Caution should be exercised when assessing ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 in systematic reviews

2022 : Reviews in medical virology

Causal language use in systematic reviews of observational studies is often inconsistent with intent: a systematic survey

2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2

2023 : Nutrients