Articles that support this problem:
Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011
2013 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2008 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data
2016 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews
2004 : Bmc medical research methodology
Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses
2012 : Bmj
Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms
2005 : Annals of internal medicine
Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials
2004 : The american journal of medicine
The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias
2018 : Bmj evidence-based medicine
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews
2014 : Bmj
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects
2006 : Bmc medical research methodology
Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
2014 : Bmj : british medical journal
Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews
2014 : Health information & libraries journal