- Framework of problems /
- Perpetuates citation of poor quality primary study data
Articles that support this problem:
False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review
2016 : Bmj open
Systematic Reviews of Anesthesiologic Interventions Reported as Statistically Significant: Problems with Power, Precision, and Type 1 Error Protection
2015 : Anesthesia & analgesia
Some problems with Cochrane reviews of diet and chronic disease
2005 : European journal of clinical nutrition
(Meta) analyze this: systematic reviews might lose credibility
2012 : Nature medicine
The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change
2015 : Bmj: british medical journal
The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews
2013 : Plos one
The role of authors of systematic reviews in exposing research misconduct
2011 : Bahrain medical bulletin
A case study of a retracted systematic review on interactive health communication applications: impact on media, scientists, and patients
2005 : Journal of medical internet research
What should the Cochrane Collaboration do about research that is, or might be, fraudulent?
2013 : Cochrane database of systematic reviews
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
2016 : Bmj open
Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case
2009 : Anesthesiology
Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
2009 : Journal of negative results in biomedicine
Predatory publishing dilutes and distorts evidence in systematic reviews
2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Accounting for single center effects in systematic reviews cannot be overlooked
2017 : Critical care
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses
2009 : International journal of epidemiology
The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence
2010 : Bmj
The need for caution in interpreting high quality systematic reviews
2001 : Bmj
A Cochrane review on brain [18F]FDG PET in dementia: limitations and future perspectives
2015 : European journal of nuclear medicine & molecular imaging
Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2015 : Statistics in medicine
Methodological issues and recommendations for systematic reviews of prognostic studies: an example from cardiovascular disease
2014 : Systematic reviews
Comment on: Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses
2020 : European journal of orthodontics
Retracted randomized controlled trials were cited and not corrected in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines
2022 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Herbal medicine for COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
2022 : Phytomedicine
Caution should be exercised when assessing ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 in systematic reviews
2022 : Reviews in medical virology