- Framework of problems /
- Interpreted without considering certainty or overall quality of the evidence base
Articles that support this problem:
Divine intervention? A Cochrane review on intercessory prayer gone beyond science and reason
2009 : Journal of negative results in biomedicine
High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
2017 : European journal of anaesthesiology
Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review
2014 : Journal of clinical periodontology
Clinical Vignettes Inadequate to Assess Impact of Implicit Bias: Concerning Limitations of a Systematic Review
2017 : Academic emergency medicine
Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study
2005 : Bmj
Examining the quality of evidence to support the effectiveness of interventions: an analysis of systematic reviews
2016 : Bmj open
Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
2018 : Systematic reviews
A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews
2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library
2019 : Health & quality of life outcomes
Quality of Cochrane reviews: Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews
2002 : Bmj: british medical journal
Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics
2019 : Journal of dentistry
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
2016 : Plos medicine
Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity
2017 : Clinical obesity
Systematic reviews on interventions for COVID-19 have rarely graded the certainty of the evidence
2021 : Sao paulo medical journal
Mind-body exercises for osteoarthritis: an overview of systematic reviews including 32 meta-analyses
2023 : Disability & rehabilitation
Caution should be exercised when assessing ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 in systematic reviews
2022 : Reviews in medical virology
Systematic Review on Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Revisiting the Methodology
2023 : Journal of clinical oncology
Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study
2023 : Bmc medical research methodology