Articles that support this problem:
A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection
2013 : Bmc research notes
High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews
2005 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Data extraction methods: an analysis of internal reporting discrepancies in single manuscripts and practical advice
2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Errors in systematic reviews: an example of computed tomography screening for lung cancer
2014 : European journal of cancer prevention
Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome
2010 : American journal of gastroenterology
Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews
2004 : Jama
Incorrect inclusion of individual studies and methodological flaws in systematic review and meta-analysis
2014 : British journal of general practice
Missing binary data extraction challenges from Cochrane reviews in mental health and Campbell reviews with implications for empirical research
2017 : Research synthesis methods
Cochrane has not consistently followed the COPE guidelines
2020 : European journal of clinical investigation
Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence
2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology
Selecting studies (not reports) as the unit of interest of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an essential practice
2020 : International journal of obesity
Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
2009 : Bmj
Letter to the Editor concerning "The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials" by Ricciardi L, et al. (Eur Spine J; [2019] 28:1821-1828)
2020 : European spine journal
Appraising the exercise oncology literature: a reminder of the rigour needed in systematic reviews
2019 : British journal of sports medicine
Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study
2022 : Bmj
RE: Physical Activity and the Risk of Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies and a Bias Analysis
2020 : Journal of the national cancer institute
Importance of excluded duplicates reporting in a systematic review
2021 : World journal of pediatrics
Errors and Biases in Meta-analysis of the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients With COVID-19
2021 : Otolaryngology - head and neck surgery (united states)
Methodological considerations for systematic review and meta-analysis of Xpert bladder cancer monitor
2022 : Urologic oncology: seminars and original investigations
Letter to the editor regarding "The effectiveness of manual therapy on pain, physical function, and nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
2022 : International orthopaedics