Framework item – Systematic Reviewlution

Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality

2009 : Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 : Plos medicine

Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012

2015 : The journal of urology

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008

2010 : The journal of urology

The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality

2017 : Bju international

Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics

2019 : Journal of dentistry

Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta‐epidemiology study

2020 : Journal of evidence‐based medicine

Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology

2017 : Journal of hand surgery (european volume)

Methodologic quality of systematic reviews published in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a systematic review

2016 : Plastic and reconstructive surgery

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review

2017 : Cancer epidemiology

The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews

2017 : Bmc ophthalmology

DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

2019 : Acta diabetologica

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals

2015 : Nursing outlook

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies

2012 : Human reproduction

Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments

2009 : Quality of life research

The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments

2016 : Quality of life research

The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map

2018 : Plos one [electronic resource]

Methodological quality of systematic reviews and clinical trials on women's health published in a Brazilian evidence-based health journal

2013 : Clinics

Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews

2008 : Clinical journal of the american society of nephrology

Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement

2016 : Jama facial plastic surgery

Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review

2017 : Nutrition research

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality

2013 : Journal of medical internet research

Prostate Artery Embolisation: Poor Design and Reporting Impact the Value of Current Systematic Reviews

2018 : European urology

Peer Reviewed: Quality of Systematic Reviews of Observational Nontherapeutic Studies

2010 : Preventing chronic disease

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics

2011 : Orthodontics & craniofacial research

Methodologic Assessment of the Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Systematic Review

2018 : Ophthalmic research

Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews

2012 : Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy

Systematic reviews in burns care: poor quality and getting worse

2017 : Journal of burn care & research

Quality assessment of systematic reviews of vitamin D, cognition and dementia

2018 : Bjpsych open

An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions

2012 : International journal of clinical pharmacy

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Relating to Performance of All-Ceramic Implant Abutments, Frameworks, and Restorations

2021 : Journal of prosthodontics

Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans

2013 : Journal of periodontology

Synthesizing and Appraising the Quality of the Evidence on Factors Associated with Medication Adherence in Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

2017 : Value in health regional issues

Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines

2019 : Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview

2017 : Journal of prosthetic dentistry

Assessment of methodological quality for included studies is necessary in a systematic review

2015 : Critical care medicine

Systematic Reviews: Are They Actually Well Conducted and Reported in Accordance with PRISMA?

2020 : Bulletin of emergency & trauma

An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence

2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools

2005 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews

2020 : Bmc medical research methodology

How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study

2020 : Bmc medical research methodology

Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects

2006 : Bmc medical research methodology

Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review

2016 : Evidence based library and information practice

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation

2013 : Journal of the american dental association

The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: a quality assessment of systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of the american dental association

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality

2017 : Systematic reviews

Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study

2017 : Systematic reviews

Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks

2020 : Journal of medical virology

Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review

2014 : Plos one

Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals

2011 : Plos one

An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs)

2013 : Plos one

Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews

2006 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review

2012 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Systematic reviews synthesized evidence without consistent quality assessment of primary studies examining epidemiology of chronic diseases