- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
- Digital technologies to prevent falls in people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a rapid systematic overview of systematic reviews
Ref ID | 1009 |
First Author | C. Eost-Telling |
Journal | AGE AGEING |
Year Of Publishing | 2024 |
URL | https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/53/1/afad238/7517659?login=true |
Keywords |
Risk of bias Neurology Low methodological quality |
Problem(s) |
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality |
Number of systematic reviews included | 7 |
Summary of Findings | Overall quality in the seven included Systematic Reviews (SRs) was low in three (flaw in one critical domain) and critically low in four reviews (flaws in more than one critical domain). None of the SRs provided a list of excluded studies with reasons nor reported on the sources of funding of included studies. Only 2 studies (29%) accounted for risk of bias in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |